Magnolia Production Well Development Program
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005071135
Lead Agency
City of Big Bear Lake
Document Title
Magnolia Production Well Development Program
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/17/2005
Present Land Use
Primarily low density residential
Document Description
The proposed Magnolia production well would allow increased well pump cycling so that existing DWP wells could be turned off or rested more frequently, thereby reducing localized water table drawdown associated with pumping. The proposed production well would also serve to replace production lost because existing wells have been removed from production for maintenance, water quality or other reasons. The proposed production well location has been selected based upon water bearing potential, results of test well drilling and water quality sampling. The proposed well is expected to yield between 100 and 300 gpm but to be active 56% of the time such that it would be equivalent to yielding between 56 and 168 gpm. The proposed well would thus yield 90 to 270 acre-feet/year. Thus, the combined existing and proposed water extraction would total approximately 580 acre-feet/year.
Contact Information
Name
Scott Heule
Agency Name
City of Big Bear Lake
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Big Bear Lake
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Magnolia Lane and Wabash Avenue
State Highways
38
Airports
Big Bear Airport
Waterways
Baldwin Lake
Township
2N
Range
1E
Section
24
Base
SBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Big Bear Lake Department of Water and Power
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.