Foothill Feeder Repair and Future Inspections Project, Supplemental EIR

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2005071082
Lead Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Document Title
Foothill Feeder Repair and Future Inspections Project, Supplemental EIR
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The Supplemental EIR describes new information and modifications to the 2005 EIR, to support future repairs and routine dewatering and inspections of the 17.8 mile Foothill Feeder, including: 1) potential incidental take of unarmored threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni) 2) an additional work site; 3) two additional generators and two submersible pumps; 4) potential for an unplanned shutdown requiring rapid pipeline dewatering; and 5) establishment of a UTS mitigation site per Fish and Game Code, section 2081.10 (a)-(g), and potential impacts associated with establishment of UTS mitigation.

Contact Information
Sean Carlson
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
P.O. Box 54153
Los Angeles, CA 90054-0153

(213) 217-6276
mmeisler@mwdh2o.com

Location

Coordinates
34°25'9.15"N 118°32'9.43"W
Cities
Santa Clarita
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Fairview Drive/Grandview Drive, Bridgeport Lane/Newhall Ranch Road, Lake Hughes Road
Zip
91355
Total Acres
<1
State Highways
I-5
Railways
Union Pacific / Metrolink
Schools
Bridgeport ES
Waterways
Santa Clara River, San Francisquito Creek
Other Information
Cross Streets: Road, San Fernando Rd. / Railroad Avenue. Waterways: Castaic Creek.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
700 N. Alameda Street, LA, CA 90012

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search