Gosford Village Shopping Center
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005061169
Lead Agency
City of Bakersfield
Document Title
Gosford Village Shopping Center
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/13/2007
Present Land Use
Service Industrial (SI) and General Manufacturing (M-2)
Document Description
The project applicant is Castle and Cooke California Commercial-CA Inc. and proposes a General Plan Land Use Element Amendment by changing the project site designation from SI (Service Industrial) to a GC (General Commercial) designation. A concurrent zone change would be required to change the project site designation from M-2 (General Manufacturing) to a PCD (Planned Commercial Development) on 73.53 acres. The proposed project is the development of a retail commercial center, which includes a maximum of 700,000 square feet on 73.53 acres. The project includes the development of 23 pads for tenants that include various major retail, fast food, and commercial retail uses, as well as a gas station. The project is anticipated to be anchored by seven major retail tenants, including Sam's Club, Kohl's Department Store, and a Wal-Mart Supercenter.
Contact Information
Name
Jennie Eng
Agency Name
City of Bakersfield
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Pacheco Road and Gosford Road
Total Acres
73.53
Jobs
1594
Parcel #
497-010-24
Railways
UPRR, Sunset RR
Waterways
Stine Canal, Arvin Edison Canal, Buena Vista Canal, and James Levee Canal
Township
30S
Range
27E
Section
20
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Bakersfield
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.