Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District (RRBWSD) Water Banking and Exchange Program
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005061157
Lead Agency
Castaic Lake Water Agency
Document Title
Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District (RRBWSD) Water Banking and Exchange Program
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/30/2006
Present Land Use
Lands within the CLWA service area have a wide variety of zoning designations. The SWP is not subject to local zoning except as permitted by the California Legislature.
Document Description
The project is CLWA's participation in the RRBWSD's Groundwater Storage, Banking, Exchange, Extraction & Conjunctive Use Program (RRBWSD Program). CLWA proposes to take delivery of its total SWP Table A Amount allocation and any other SWP water supplies made available by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to the SWP Contractors, and deliver to RRBWSD the portion of that water that is not needed to meet its demands (typically in wetter years), up to 20,000 acre-feet per year (AFY) in the RRBWSD Program. RRBWSD would store a portion of CLWA's unused SWP delivers for later withdrawal and delivery to the CLWA service area in a future year or years when demand in the CLWA service area is greater than supply (i.e., in drier years). CLWA's current SWP Table A Amount is 95,200 AFY. CLWA's current estimated Table A supply in average, single dry, and multiple dry years is 65,700 AF, 3,800 AF, and 30,500 AF, respectively, based on reliability results for historical periods included in DWR's "Excerpts from Working Draft 2005 SWP Delivery Reliability Report."
Contact Information
Name
Craig Trombly
Agency Name
Department of Water Resources
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bakersfield, San Joaquin
Total Acres
~1-2
Waterways
Castaic Lakes, Kern River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Water Resources
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.