Agreement to Construct Magic Mountain Pipeline Phases 4-6

11 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2005051143
Lead Agency
Los Angeles County
Document Title
Agreement to Construct Magic Mountain Pipeline Phases 4-6
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/24/2015
Present Land Use
Vacant and Agricultural/newhall ranch Specific Plan: Newhall Ranch Specific Plan, Non-urban, SEA/Heavy Agriculture A-2-5
Document Description
Project is the approval of an agreement to reimburse Newhall Land for the construction costs of two drinking water pipelines located in the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 199501115), which was certified by the County of Los Angeles on May 28, 2003, and the Mission Village Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2005051143) certified by the County of Los Angeles on October 25, 2011. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred.

Contact Information

Name
Jeff Ford
Agency Name
Castaic Lake Water Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Santa Clarita
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
The old Road, Commerce Center Drive
Total Acres
1,261.8
Parcel #
2826-0030 (021-24 & 26-30)
State Highways
I-5, SR-126
Railways
no
Airports
no
Schools
Rancho Pico Jr. HS, West Ranch HS
Waterways
Santa Clara River, Castaic Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Castaic Lake Water Agency
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print