High Desert State Prison / California Correctional Center Arsenic Groundwater Treatment System
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005042114
Lead Agency
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
(CDCR)
Document Title
High Desert State Prison / California Correctional Center Arsenic Groundwater Treatment System
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/1/2005
Present Land Use
Institutional
Document Description
The California Department of Corrections (CDC) proposes to construct and operate a single groundwater treatment plant at High Desert State Prison (HDSP) that would remove arsenic from groundwater for both the HSDP and the adjacent California Correction Center (CCC). A granular iron media system would be used to remove the arsenic. The proposed project includes a groundwater treatment plant and associated instrumentation, chemical storage tanks, water regulating tank, process waste treatment and disposal, and new groundwater conveyance piping. The ground water treatment system is required to meet new adopted arsenic regulations to reduce maximum contaminant levels for drinking water.
Contact Information
Name
Cher Daniels
Agency Name
Department of Corrections
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Susanville
Counties
Lassen
Cross Streets
Center Road / Rice Canyon Road
Zip
96127
State Highways
395
Waterways
Susan River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Corrections
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.