Men 128 / 253 Culvert Rehabilitation Draft Environmental Document
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005042089
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 3
Document Title
Men 128 / 253 Culvert Rehabilitation Draft Environmental Document
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/26/2005
Present Land Use
Rural Residential
Document Description
Caltrans is proposing to rehabilitate or replace deteriorated culverts and appurtenant structures at 270 locations on SR 128 and 253 in Mendocino County. There are 213 of these culverts crossing SR 128 and 57 of the culverts cross SR 253 from the 128/253 junction to the south end of Ukiah. Trenchless technologies or jacking methods may be utilized to replace the existing culverts at some locations. Other proposed work includes replacing or adding downdrains, overside drains, anchor assemblies, rock energy dissipaters, and concrete headwalls/endwalls. Replacement of non-standard drainage inlets with standard drainage inlets will also be completed at appropriate locations. Ditch grading of the existing channels will be needed to provide for positive and uninterrupted flows. Erosion control will be implemented around culverts where the ground is disturbed.
Contact Information
Name
Karen McWilliams
Agency Name
Department of Transportation, District 3
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Booneville, Ukiah
Counties
Mendocino
Cross Streets
SR 253; SR 128 @ Junction 253 to Pt. Arena
Zip
95414, 482
State Highways
1, 101
Waterways
Navarro River
Range
17W
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Caltrans
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.