Eureka South Gate Industrial Park
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005032101
Lead Agency
City of Eureka
Document Title
Eureka South Gate Industrial Park
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/24/2005
Present Land Use
General Industrial (MG, zoning; GI, general plan)
Document Description
The applicant proposes to adjust an existing lot line between two parcels and subsequently construct a total of approximately 92,500 square feet of warehouse and office space on the reconfigured parcels. With the exception of sensitive habitat areas and buffers, the site will be developed with buildings, parking areas, and traffic lanes. The project includes landscaping throughout the complex. Pro Pacific Fresh, a produce distribution company, will occupy approximately 27,900 square feet of the proposed building space. It is anticipated that the remaining space will be occupied by other local business looking to expand or relocate for business growth and development. The lot line adjustment is proposed in order to facilitate the demolition of the existing buildings and replacement of Pro Pacific's new facility.
Contact Information
Name
Sidnie L. Olson
Agency Name
City of Eureka
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Location
Cities
Eureka
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Broadway (Hwy 101) / Herrick Avenue
Zip
95501
Parcel #
302-171-034, 037
State Highways
101
Railways
NWPRR
Waterways
Humboldt Bay
Township
4N
Range
1W
Section
4
Base
HBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.