LaFortune Residence Grading Permit (EIAQ-3816)
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004122118
Lead Agency
Placer County
Document Title
LaFortune Residence Grading Permit (EIAQ-3816)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/25/2008
Present Land Use
Vacant lot / PAS 014 / Cedar Flat Residential
Document Description
A variance to the size limitation of 1,600 square feet for all residential accessory structures to allow for 3,269 square feet in order to construct a primary three-car detached garage with recreation/exercise room above (1,549 square feet), a guesthouse (1,000 square feet) with a covered deck (144 square feet), and a two-car guest garage (576 sq. ft.). The applicant also requests a variance to the front setback requirement of 20' from property line to allow for a setback of 10' in order to construct a stacked block retaining wall and underground footing and 16' for a poured concrete retaining wall (12' for the under ground footing of the retaining wall).
Contact Information
Name
Peg Rein
Agency Name
Placer County Community Development Resource Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
3825 North Lake Boulevard
Total Acres
3.5
Parcel #
092-100-007
State Highways
28
Waterways
Lake Tahoe
Township
16N
Range
17E
Section
28
Base
MDBM
Other Location Info
Cedar Flat area of Lake Tahoe
3825 N. Lake Boulevard
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Placer County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.