Local Resources Program Agreement between Metropolitan Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District for the Perris II Brackish Groundwater Desalter Reloc

SCH Number: 2004114006
Lead Agency: Public Health, Department of (California Department of Public Health)
Document Title: Local Resources Program Agreement between Metropolitan Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District for the Perris II Brackish Groundwater Desalter Reloc
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 11/30/2016
Posted: 11/30/2016
Present Land Use: Well site (Well 22), vacant industrial site (Well 23) Z: Agricultural / Rural Residential

Document Description: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern CA proposes to enter into a Local Resources Program (LRP) agreement with Eastern Municipal Water District for the Perris II Brackish Groundwater Desalter. The project would provide up to 5,500 acre-feet per year (AFY) of treated groundwater for potable uses within EMWD's service area. The project would help Metropolitan to achieve its LRP goals and meet its legislative mandates.

Contact Information: Helen Stratton
Metropolitan Water District of Southern CA
P.O. Box 54163
Los Angeles, CA 90054-0153
Phone : 951-928-3777 x4545

Cities: San Jose
Counties: Riverside
Cross Streets: Well 22: Richmond Avenue / Santa Teresa Boulevard Well 23: Laguna Avenue / Monterey Road
Parcel #: 712-04-101 (Well 22); 712-18-008 (Well 23)
State Highways: US 101
Railways: SPRR
Airports: N/A
Waterways: Coyote Creek, Laguna Seco Creek
Township: 9S
Range: 2E
Section: N/A

Approving Agency: Metropolitan Water District of Southern CA
Approving Agency Role: Responsible Agency
Approved On: 11/22/2016
Final EIR Available Location: 700 Norht Alameda Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: N/A