Highway 25 Safety & Operational Enhancements Project

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2004111106
Lead Agency
Caltrans 6 (Fresno) (California Department of Transportation, District 6)
Document Title
Highway 25 Safety & Operational Enhancements Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/28/2005
Present Land Use
Agricultural

Document Description
Caltrans proposes to enhance safety and improve intersection operations along SR 25 between Wright Road in San Benito County and the UPRR crossing just east of US 101 in Santa Clara County, a length of approximately 18 km (11.2 miles). Proposed intersection improvements include left-turn lanes, acceleration/deceleration lanes, improved sight distance, and accommodation of truck turns at Wright Road, Briggs Road (East and West), Flynn Road, Hudner Lane, Shore Road, and Bolsa Road. The southern entrance to Briggs Road (East) would also be closed. Concrete median barriers would be provided along portions of the highway including standard widths for the median shoulder, traveled way, outside shoulder, and clear recovery zone, which would require minor widening of the roadyway. Consolidation of private driveways would be required to connect local street intersections.

Contact Information
Gary Gagliolo
California Department of Transportation
1120 N Street
Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone : (559) 243-8299

Location

Cities
Gilroy Hollister
Counties
San Benito Santa Clara
State Highways
101, 156
Railways
SPRR
Airports
Hollister
Waterways
Pajaro River, Carnadero Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Transportation
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
Caltrans District 6 2015 E. Shields Avenue, Suite 100 Fresno, CA 93726

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search