Sweeney Mitigation Site Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0042-R6 [Revision 2])
15 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004111103
Lead Agency
Riverside County Transportation Commission
(RCTC)
Document Title
Sweeney Mitigation Site Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0042-R6 [Revision 2])
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/4/2019
Present Land Use
Many Various
Document Description
In April 2015, the Final EIR/EIS and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation for the MCP Project was recorded. In July 2018, an Addendum to the EIR/EIS was prepared and proved regarding some minor modifications to the MCP. In January 2019, minor design refinements to the MCP have been proposed regarding the I-215 Placentia Interchange, including slightly adjusted ramps alignments, designation of bike lanes, rerouting of a sewer line, replacement of an existing culvert, addition of new drainage basins, addition of new traffic signals, and acquisition of additional right-of-way. These changes were analyzed in a second Addendum to the EIR/EIS
Contact Information
Name
Alex Menor
Agency Name
Riverside County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Corona, Perris, San Jacinto
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Many
Parcel #
Many
State Highways
I-215 and SR-79
Railways
BNSF
Airports
March Air
Schools
Many
Waterways
Many
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Riverside County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.