Grant Joint union High School District New High School/Middle School
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004102018
Lead Agency
Twin Rivers Unified School District
Document Title
Grant Joint union High School District New High School/Middle School
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/29/2009
Document Description
The Twin Rivers USD has prepared the Draft SEIR to address changes to the Grant Joint Union New High School/Middle School Project (now referred to as the East Natomas Education Complex, for which a Final EIR was approved in 2006. Proposed changes to the original project include construction in 4 phases, with phase 1 including grading and building shell construction, phase 2 designed to accommodate 550 students, phase 3 designed to accommodate 1,000 students, and phase 4 designed to accommodate 2,800 students. Other changes include the reconfiguration of ancillary facilities, such as the sports stadium; delayed construction of the project, depending on funding; temporary access from Sorento Road; relocation of the detention basin to the south of the southwest corner of the project site; excavation of the the project sit, and stockpiling of 200,000 cubic yards of cut; changes to the provision of public services; landscaped irrigation via an onsite groundwater well; and annexation of the project site into the City of Sacramento.
Contact Information
Name
Jeff Doyle
Agency Name
Twin Rivers Unified School District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Sorento Rd and East Levee Rd
Total Acres
86
Parcel #
201-032-018, 019, 024
Schools
Regency Park ES,Heron,Natomas Park ES,Merryhill,Natomas Charter,
Waterways
Natomas East Main Drainage Canal
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
Nearest Community: Natomas
Other Information
Schools: Westside ES, Grant Union Joint Union HS
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Twin Rivers USD
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.