New High School / Middle School Initial Study
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004102018
Lead Agency
Twin Rivers Unified School District
Document Title
New High School / Middle School Initial Study
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/18/2006
Present Land Use
Grazing, AG-80, General Agriculture
Document Description
A combined high school and middle school facility with a performing arts center and lighted stadium in the North Natomas area. The project site is south of Elkhorn Boulevard, West of East Levee Road, within the County of Sacramento, and is within an area proposed for annexation into the City of Sacramento, as part of the proposed Panhandle Project. The high school would have a capacity to accommodate approximately 1,800 students, and the middle school would have a capacity to accommodate around 1,000 students, for a total student population of 2,800 students. The performing arts center would provide seating for approximately 750 people and the jointly operated stadium would have 3,000 seats and would be lighted to accommodate nighttime use.
Contact Information
Name
John Raymond
Agency Name
Grant Joint Union High School District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Elkhorn Boulevard / E. Levee Road
Total Acres
84
Parcel #
201-32-018, 019
State Highways
99
Waterways
Steelhead Creek
Township
22S
Range
25E
Section
33
Base
SBBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Grant Joint Union High School District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.