Grossamer Grove Specific Plan Amendment No. 16-27
21 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004101029
Lead Agency
City of Shafter
Document Title
Grossamer Grove Specific Plan Amendment No. 16-27
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/25/2016
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
Lennar Homes of CA requested an amendment to the adopted Grossamer Grove Specific Plan for minor changes to the residential land use configuration plan, Community Drive intersections, development standards, and document updates. The Estate Residential designation on the eastern side of the specific plan (PA-1) is moved to a western and central location (PA-2 and PA-3) and replaced with Low Density Residential land use. The residential change for PA-1 increased the no. of residential units from 166 to 299. A corresponding reduction occurs in PA-2 and PA-3. The southern edge of PA-1 is provided a 34 foot wide access corridor addressing existing residences to the south. The Community Drive intersections at Cotton Creek Drive and Cobble Creek Drive are enhanced for pedestrian use/walkability to the school site. Three drill islands are designated. An addendum to the Certified FEIR for the 2005 General Plan Update and related actions (sch 2004101029) was prepared for Amendment No. 16-27.
Contact Information
Name
Wayne Clausen
Agency Name
City of Shafter Comm. Dev. Dept.
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Shafter
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Citywide
Zip
93263, 312
Total Acres
46,583
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR-43, SR-99
Railways
BNSF, UPRR Santa Fe
Airports
Shafter / Minter Field
Schools
Richland School District, Kern HS District, Norris ESD
Township
28/27S
Range
25/24E
Section
Varies
Base
MDB&M
Other Information
Zip Code: 93308
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Shafter
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.