Ironhouse Sanitary District Facilities Expansion Project - Subsequent EIR
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004082035
Lead Agency
Ironhouse Sanitary District
(ISD)
Document Title
Ironhouse Sanitary District Facilities Expansion Project - Subsequent EIR
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/18/2007
Present Land Use
Public / Semi-Public
Document Description
Upgrade of Ironhouse Sanitary District's wastewater facilities and increase treatment and disposal capacity from 2.3 mgd to 8.6 mgd. Upgrade alternatives developed in the environmental document include:
- Alternative A: Conveyance of treated effluent from ISD into the San Joaquin River for disposal.
- Alternative B: Conveyance of raw sewage from ISD to Delta Diablo Sanitation District for treatment and disposal into the New York Slough.
- Alternative C: Conveyance of treated effluent from ISD and City of Brentwood into New York Slough for disposal.
- Alternative D: Conveyance of treated effluent from ISD and City of Brentwood into the Sacramento River for disposal.
Contact Information
Name
Thomas Williams
Agency Name
Ironhouse Sanitary District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Oakley
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
Walnut Meadows Drive, Vintage Parkway
Zip
94561
Total Acres
735 +
Parcel #
037-191-033, 034
State Highways
4, 160
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Vintage Parkway ES, Iron House ES, Delta Vista MS, Gehringer ES
Waterways
San Joaquin River near Jersey Island
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Board of Directors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.