Feather-Bear Rivers Levee Setback Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004072113
Lead Agency
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority
Document Title
Feather-Bear Rivers Levee Setback Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/17/2004
Present Land Use
Agriculture / Exclusive Agriculture / Valley Agriculture and Specific Plan
Document Description
The preferred alternative would entail setting back to north levee of the lower Bear River from 1,400 feet below the State Route 70 crossing to about 1 mile north of the confluence with the Feather River, converting the land in the expanded floodway area to natural habitats, and removing an orchard from the Bear River floodway. These actions would address identified deficiencies in the levee, lower upstream water surface elevations, and enhance fish and wildlife habitat.
Contact Information
Name
Charles K. McClain
Agency Name
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Marysville, Yuba City
Counties
Yuba
Cross Streets
Feather River Boulevard / Highway 70
Total Acres
322
Parcel #
016-150-004, 007, 020, 017, 019, 021; 016-130-014
State Highways
99, 70
Railways
Western Pacific
Waterways
Feather and Bear Rivers, Western Pacific Interceptor Canal
Other Location Info
City: Linda, Olivehurst
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.