Hitachi Campus and Mixed-Use Transit Village Project (Corrective Action Remedy Selection)
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004072110
Lead Agency
City of San Jose
Document Title
Hitachi Campus and Mixed-Use Transit Village Project (Corrective Action Remedy Selection)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/28/2006
Present Land Use
Industrial Park
Document Description
The California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has approved a correction action remedy for the Redevelopment Property at the Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc. The approved remedy is to remove all contaminated soil on the Redevelopment Property above DTSC established cleanup levels and dispose of the soil at an approved landfill.
Contact Information
Name
Paul Ruffin
Agency Name
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Jose
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Cottle Road, Monterey Hwy. 85, and Manassas Road
Total Acres
332
Parcel #
706-04-015, 016; 706-05-034; 706-06-013, 016; 706-07-001, 002, 003, 004; 706-08-001, 002, 003,
State Highways
82, 85, 101
Railways
light rail, Caltrain
Airports
N/A
Schools
East Side Union, Evergreen, Oak Grove, Morgan Hill Unified, San
Waterways
Coyote, Canoas
Other Information
Parcel Nos: 004, 005, 006, 016.
Schools: San Jose USD
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.