Riverbend Bike Path Project. SAA 1600-2009-0225
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2004072018
- Lead Agency
- Stockton, City of (City of Stockton)
- Document Title
- Riverbend Bike Path Project. SAA 1600-2009-0225
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- The Claifornia Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2009-0225-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, KB Home Northern California & Reno. The project proposes to construct a bike path approximately 850 feet in length. The bike path will be constructed near the top, interior side of the levee. Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil will be excavated from the upper floodplain area and replaced with concrete, gravel, and rip-rap. The footprint of the path will be 30 feet wide with a 15 foot wide finished pathway.
- Contact Information
-
Amy Kennedy
Department of Fish and Game
1701 Nimbus Road Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95670
916-358-2842
Location
- Cities
- Stockton
- Counties
- San Joaquin
- Cross Streets
- McAllen / Iiams / Wild Grape Drive
- Total Acres
- 169
- State Highways
- SR-99
- Railways
- UP/SP RR
- Schools
- Geo Bush
- Waterways
- Calaveras River, Diverting Canal
- Range
- 6E
- Section
- NE 1/4
- Base
- Diablo
- Other Information
- Section: of sec. 29
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Department of Fish and Game
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- City of Stockton, Planning Division 425 North El Dorado Street Stockton, CA 95202
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes