Sweet Ranch Mitigation Project [CA Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2010-029-03 (ITP)]
10 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004062018
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 4
Document Title
Sweet Ranch Mitigation Project [CA Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2010-029-03 (ITP)]
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/27/2011
Present Land Use
Open Space with Agricultural and Residential uses.
Document Description
The DFG approval that is the subject of this notice is a Minor Amendment to a CESA ITP previously issued to the Caltrans for the Sweet Ranch Mitigation Project in Alameda County, CA. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, S 783.6, subd. (c)(4).) The Minor Amendment as issued by DFG, makes minor modifications to certain portions of the project description and related conditions in the original ITP, an authorization permitting the incidental take of CA tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), a species designated as threatened under CESA. The Minor Amendment does not increase the amount of take as originally authorized, nor will it increase other project impacts on the species.
Contact Information
Name
Scott Wilson
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Livermore
Counties
Alameda
State Highways
84
Waterways
Vallecitos Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.