Confusion Hill Highway Relocation Project

9 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2004052014
Lead Agency
Caltrans 1 (Eureka) (California Department of Transportation, District 1)
Document Title
Confusion Hill Highway Relocation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The proposed project involves relocating a section of Hwy. 101 at Confusion Hill between post miles 98.9 and 100.8. The proposed project would relocate the route from the east side of the South Fork of the Eel River (SFER) to the west side of the SFER, and would involve construction of two bridges, two retaining walls, and a through-cut, as well as water drafting, low water crossings, and pile installation activities which have the potential to impact sensitive resources. The bridges have been designed to keep all permanent structures out of the 100-year floodplain of SFER. Construction of the bridges shall require installation of trestles within the channel of the SFER. The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2005-0697-3 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code.

Contact Information
Corinne Gray
California Department of Fish and Game
P.O. Box 47
Yountville, CA 94599

(707) 944-5526

Location

Counties
Mendocino
Cross Streets
Limits of Project - Route 101 KP R59.2/R162.2 (PM R98.9/R100.8)
Parcel #
053-240-13, 053-250-09 & 10, 053-270-01, 02, 05, 06, 08, 09
State Highways
101
Waterways
South Fork Eel River
Township
24N
Range
17W
Section
17,18
Base
MDBM
Other Location Info
Legget, Piercy; Gaberville

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
Caltrans 1656 Union Street Eureka, CA 95501

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Download CSV New Search