California Aqueduct San Joaquin Field Division Habitat Conservation Plan
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004051117
Lead Agency
California Department of Water Resources
(DWR)
Document Title
California Aqueduct San Joaquin Field Division Habitat Conservation Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/23/2005
Present Land Use
Land use activities on and adjacent to the California Aqueduct right of way include operation / maintenance of DWR facilities; recreation; agriculture; residential, commercial and industrial uses; nature preserves; oil and gas operations.
Document Description
The DWR proposes to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for work associated with maintenance activities, minor construction, and emergency procedures for State Water Project facilities located in the San Joaquin Field Division (Kettleman City to Edmonston Pumping Plant). DWR prepared a Habitat Conservation Plan, which specifies modifications to operation and maintenance procedures, and conservation measures, to insure the project activities avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to sensitive species.
Contact Information
Name
Eliza Sater
Agency Name
Department of Water Resources
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Kern, Kings
Other Location Info
The HCP Area is defined as the Right of way along the California Aqueduct from Kettleman City to Edmonston Pumping Plant at the base of the Tehachapi Mountains, a distance of 121 miles. Also included are Coastal Branch Phase 1 and areas owned or leased by DWR at seven pumping plants and two operations and maintenance centers: Buena Vista Pumping Plant, Teerink Pumping Plant, Chrisman Pumping Plant, Edmonston Pumping Plant, San Joaquin Field Division Operations and Maintenance Center, and Lost Hills Operation/Maintenance Center.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA Department of Water Resources
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.