(Revised) Mokelumne Bluffs Tentative Subdivision Map No. 120
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004042158
Lead Agency
Amador County
Document Title
(Revised) Mokelumne Bluffs Tentative Subdivision Map No. 120
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/12/2010
Document Description
Revised Mokelumne Bluffs Subdivision Map No. 120 proposing the division for 137.86 acres into 98 Single Family Residential lots and 2 Recreational parcels; variance from Amador County Code Section 17.28.064 (3:1 deoth to width ratio for lots less than 20 acres in size) for proposed Lots 21, 22, 24, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 48, and 49; and zone change from "RE-10", Residential Estates (10 acres minimum) District to "R1-B3", Single Family Residential (40,000 sf minimum) District for those portions of the project not current zoned "R1-B3", and "RE-40", Residential Estates (40 acre minimum) District to "RE-10", Residential Estates (10 acre minimum) District for proposed Lot 35.
Contact Information
Name
Steve Branco
Agency Name
Amador County Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Amador
Cross Streets
Ranch Drive / SR 88
Zip
95642
Total Acres
138
Parcel #
038-210-068
State Highways
SR 88
Waterways
Grass Valley Creek
Township
6N
Range
12E
Section
1, 2
Base
MDBM
Other Location Info
Nearest City: Pine Grove
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Amador County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.