Army Depot Redevelopment Plan Second Amendment
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004012044
Lead Agency
Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
Document Title
Army Depot Redevelopment Plan Second Amendment
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/2/2004
Present Land Use
Community/Neighborhood Commercial & Offices; Parks/Recreation/Open Spaces; Heavy Commercial or Warehouse; Low Density and High Density Residential
Document Description
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Sacramento proposes to amend the Sacramento Army Depot Redevelopment Plan by adding approximately 1,527 acres, the "Adding Area." An analysis prepared for the Redevelopment Agency determined that the Added Area's commerical and residential properties are in physical and economic decline. The analysis concluded that the tax increment financing and other redevelopment tools could be used to alleviate such blight conditions through a comprehensive improvement program.
Contact Information
Name
Sheryl Patterson
Agency Name
Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
65th Street, 17th Avenue, Power Inn Road, Elder Creek Road, South Watt Avenue
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-80, SR 50, SR 99
Railways
Union Pacific
Airports
Sacramento International; Mather
Schools
Various
Waterways
Sacramento and Americal River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Sacramento
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.