Construction of Inland Feeder/Lakeview Pipeline Service Connection EM-14
13 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003121068
Lead Agency
Eastern Municipal Water District
(EMWD)
Document Title
Construction of Inland Feeder/Lakeview Pipeline Service Connection EM-14
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/12/2008
Present Land Use
Open Space, Residential, Agriculture/OS (Open Space), RI (Residential I), RIII (Residential III) AG (Agriculture)
Document Description
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) is proposing to modify Service Connection EM-14 with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) to increase the capacity from 40cfs to 50cfs. Metropolitan will design and construct the modifications. Additionally, Metropolitan is proposing to relocate the existing AMR/air-vent/electrical pedestal away from Warren Road, as part of the service connection modifications.
Contact Information
Name
Karen Hackett
Agency Name
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Hemet, San Jacinto
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Commonwealth Avenue
Zip
92583
Total Acres
~150
State Highways
SR-74, SR-79
Railways
Santa Fe - inactive
Airports
Hemet-Ryan
Schools
Bautista Creek and Park Elementary,N.Mountain Middle School
Waterways
San Jacinto River, Bautista Creek, Poppet Creek
Township
5S
Range
1W
Section
near31
Base
SB
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.