State Route 163 Corridor Management Plan
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003121008
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 11
Document Title
State Route 163 Corridor Management Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/26/2004
Present Land Use
Highway Facility
Document Description
The purpose of this project is to reduce the severity of median accidents on SR-163 between KP 1.4-6.0 (PM 0.9-3.7), enhance the scenic quality of the corridor, and to preserve and restore historic elements. According to Caltrans Median Barrier Monitoring Program Reports (1997-2002), with 2003 data also included for additional project support, the actual fatal accident rate from KP 1.9-3.8 (PM 1.2-2.4) is 0.022 fatal accidents/per million vehicle miles/per year, which is higher than the statewide average of 0.016 fatal accidents/per million vehicle miles/per year and exceeds the Department's accident criteria warrants. The typical clear recovery zone for a freeway is 9 meters (30 feet), yet there are a number of mature trees and bridge columns within this zone along this portion of RS-163. The median barrier installation will reduce cross-median accidents, lowering the number of accidents and possibly the fatal accident rate for the SR-163 corridor.
Contact Information
Name
Debra Soifer
Agency Name
Department of Transportation, District 11
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
A Street, 6th Avenue
Zip
92101
State Highways
on 163
Other Location Info
Balboa Park
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Transportation
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.