Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Application of Copper Sulfate to Lake Mathews, Lake Skinner, and Diamond Valley Lake to Control Algal Blooms
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003111077
Lead Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Document Title
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Application of Copper Sulfate to Lake Mathews, Lake Skinner, and Diamond Valley Lake to Control Algal Blooms
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/31/2003
Present Land Use
Lake Skinner: GP Land Use Designation - Regional Park/Zoning - MWD; Lake Mathews: GPLU Designation - Public Purposes/Zoning - Official Lands; Diamond Valley lake: GPLU Designation - Public Utility/Zoning - Public Utility
Document Description
To continue application of an aquatic pesticide to 3 of its reservoirs in Riverside County. Metropolitan currently applies copper sulfate on an as-needed basis to control algal blooms. The General National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit expires on January 31, 2004. The SWRCB has notified interested parties that it intends to develop a new general NPDES permit for application of aquatic pesticides to replace the expiring General Permit.
Contact Information
Name
Anthony Klecha
Agency Name
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Hemet, Riverside
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Scott Rd and Winchester Rd/La Sierra Ave and El Sobrante
Zip
92506/70
State Highways
210
Airports
Hemet-Ryan, French Valley
Schools
West Valley HS
Waterways
Diamond Valley Lake, Lake Skinner, Lake Mathews
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California CEO
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.