Pudding Creek Trestle Rehabilitation

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2003102051
Lead Agency
California Department of Parks and Recreation
Document Title
Pudding Creek Trestle Rehabilitation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/28/2007
Present Land Use
Level 1 Use Intensity - MacKerricher State Park General Plan (June, 1995); Open Space (Mendocino County General Plan, 1981); Park and Recreation (Fort Bragg General Plan, 2002)
Document Description
The Department of Parks and Recreation (California State Parks) proposes to rehabilitate the historic Pudding Creek Trestle (Trestle), including the installation of decking and safety railings to accommodate public access onto the Trestle deck (materials and pathway access will be constructed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] requirements), and open the Trestle to the public. When opened, the Trestle would be accessible to pedestrians and bicyclists from the City of Fort Bragg and the South MacKerricher Costal Trail (Haul Rd.).

Contact Information

Name
Susan Wilcox
Agency Name
California Department of Parks & Recreation
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Fort Bragg
Counties
Mendocino
Cross Streets
State Highway 1 and Pudding Creek Road
State Highways
Hwy. 1
Railways
California Western RR shortline
Airports
Fort Bragg Airport (private)
Waterways
Pudding Creek and Pacific Ocean
Other Location Info
MacKerricher State Park
Other Information
Railways: excursion (Skunk Train)

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Parks and Recreation
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print