Placer Parkway Corridor Preservation
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003092069
Lead Agency
South Placer Regional Transportation Authority
Document Title
Placer Parkway Corridor Preservation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/7/2009
Document Description
The proposed action would select and preserve a corridor for the future Placer Parkway - a new east-west roadway linking SR 70/99 and SR 65. Potential benefits from future implementation include reducing anticipated congestion on local/regional transportation system and advancing economic development goals in south Sutter and southwestern Placer counties. Potential impacts for future implementation include effects to socioeconomic/community resources, farmlands, cultural resources, traffic/transportation, air quality, noise, hydrology, water quality, and growth.
Contact Information
Name
Celia McAdam
Agency Name
South Placer Regional Transportation Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Rocklin, Roseville
Counties
Placer, Sacramento, Sutter
Cross Streets
Multiple
Zip
multiple
Total Acres
35,449
Parcel #
multiple
State Highways
SR 70/99, SR 65
Railways
UPRR
Waterways
Pleasant Grove, Curry, Steelhead Creeks; Pleasant Grove Creek, Natomas E. Main Canals
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Pleasant Grove
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
South Placer Regional Transportation Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.