Sutter Mutual Water Company Tisdale Pumping Plant Positive Barrier Fish Screen Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003092018
Lead Agency
Reclamation District No. 1500
Document Title
Sutter Mutual Water Company Tisdale Pumping Plant Positive Barrier Fish Screen Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/28/2003
Present Land Use
Tisdale Pumping Plant 1 and 2/Agricultural
Document Description
The Tisdale Pumping Plant positive barrier fish screen structure would be a major screening structure and construction project. The overall structure would be approximately 279 feet in length. The screen would be comprised of 16 screen panels each providing 181.8 ft of screened area. Total effective screen area is 2,909 ft. The screen design would afford 960 cfs design pumping capacity while satisfying the 0.33 ft/sec approach velocity criteria (CH2M HILL 2003). The intake screen has been designed to meet CDFandG and NOAA Fisheries fish screening criteria. Design criteria and parameters for the fish screen are summarized in Table 1. Additional detailed information regarding the design of the Tisdale Pumping Plant positive barrier fish screen has been documented by CH2M HILL (2003) and provided in the attached EA/IS.
Contact Information
Name
Max Sakato
Agency Name
Reclamation District No. 1500
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Sutter
Cross Streets
Cranmore and Tisdale Road
Total Acres
7.5
Parcel #
Tisdale Weir
Waterways
Sacramento River Mile 118
Township
14N
Range
1E
Section
35
Other Location Info
Grimes
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Reclamation District 1500
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.