American Basin Fish Screen and Habitat Improvement Project (Phase I)
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003092006
Lead Agency
Fish & Game #2
Document Title
American Basin Fish Screen and Habitat Improvement Project (Phase I)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/29/2009
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2008-0334-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Natomas Central Mutual Water Company.
This project proposes to consolidate 5 unscreened diversions, located in the Sacramento River and the Natomas Cross Canal and owned and operated by the Natomas Central Mutual Water Company, into 2 consolidated diversions with state-of-the-art fish screens to be located in the Sacramento River. This project will create a new diversionfish screen/intake, a new canal to provide for connection of the new intake with the existing irrigation system, and demolition and/or decommissioning of some existing facilities.
Contact Information
Name
Kelley Barker
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento, Sutter
Cross Streets
Garden Highway from Natomas Cross Canal to Interstate 80
State Highways
SR 99 and I-5
Airports
Sacramento International
Waterways
Sacramento River, Natomas Cross Canal
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.