2004 Long Range Development Plan
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003081023
Lead Agency
University of California
Document Title
2004 Long Range Development Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/8/2004
Present Land Use
Academic, Academic/Community-Oriented, Academic/Science Research Park, Administrative, General Sciences, Housing, Medical, Mixed Use Park, Sports and Recreation Surface Parking.
Document Description
The proposed Hopkins Parking Structure is a 425,800 GSF facility to accommodate 1,418 parking spaces. The parking structure proposed to be built in a rectangular form on seven levels, with six cut into the grade at the western edge of the structure, and two levels below grade at the east. Only one level will be above existing grade at the west side, to reduce obstruction of the eastward views to the Grove and mountains from the Social Science building and Ridgewalk.
Contact Information
Name
John E. Zimmermann
Agency Name
University of California
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
La Jolla
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Gilman Drive and La Jolla Village Drive
Zip
92093
Total Acres
1152
State Highways
SR 52 and I-5
Railways
N. County Transit District
Airports
MCAS Miramir
Schools
San Diego Unified, La Jolla Country Day
Township
15S
Range
3-4W
Section
7
Base
DelMar
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
University of California
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.