Cerrito Creek Bank Stabilization and Revegitation

Summary

SCH Number
2003079059
Lead Agency
Fish & Game #3
Document Title
Cerrito Creek Bank Stabilization and Revegitation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/22/2003

Document Description
The Operator proposes to stabilize the bank of Cerrito Creek behind the house at 390 Vermont Avenue, Berkeley, Alameda County. A bank failure/landslide occurred at the rear of the house and threatened the structure. Two retaining walls were constructed behind the residence to stabilize the banks. To complete the work, the operator will install a bubbler box at the outfall under Vermont Avenue that collects runoff and conveys the water down the channel. The 3 foot by 3 foot bubbler box will be pre-fabricated and installed into the bank. The box will have an overflow gate in the top and 4 inch holes at the lower end of the box to allow passage of low flows. The creek bank will be live-staked with willow and bay trees on one foot box to allow passage of low flows. The creek bank will be live-staked with willow and bay trees on one foot centers and covered with erosion control matting and a coir roll just above the top of the creek bank. There are two stumps that are deflecting flow in the stream bed. The small stump will be completely removed and the slope will be returned to pre-project conditions.

Contact Information
Greg Martinelli
Department of Fish and Game, Region 3
P.O. Box 47
Yountville, CA 94599

Phone : (707) 944-5570

Location

Cities
Berkeley
Counties
Alameda

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
Department of Public Works Engineering Divisions 1947 Center Street Berkeley, Ca 94704

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search