Concurrence in the issuance of a revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003061074
Lead Agency
Riverside County
Document Title
Concurrence in the issuance of a revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/30/2005
Document Description
California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Alek and Streambed Agreement (SAA# 1600-2004-0100-R6) pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, the Mr. Hans W. Kernkamp, General Manager-Chief Engineer of the Riverside County Waste Management Department. For Phase II, Stage 2, of the Lamb Canyon Class III Sanitary landfill expansion, the Operator proposes to expand the disposal area by 66.3 acres and the total landfill area by 175.3 acres. The project wil permanently impact 1.174 acres of sparsely vegetated (mulefat) ephemeral streambeds.
Contact Information
Name
Jeff Brandt
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Beaumont, San Jacinto
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Gilman Springs Road
Zip
92223
Total Acres
1,088
Parcel #
421-170-034; 421-200-023, 024, 033; 421-220-014, 023, 024, 025, 026; 421-230-008, 009
State Highways
79
Township
3S
Range
1W
Section
21,28,
Base
SBBM
Other Information
Section (cont): 29
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Integrated Waste Management Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.