Downtown Strategy EIR
33 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003042127
Lead Agency
City of San Jose
Document Title
Downtown Strategy EIR
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/30/2005
Present Land Use
Residential, Commercial, Recreational and Industries Uses
Z: R-M, R-2, R-1-8 Residential Districts, DC, CO, CN, CG Commercial Districts, IP, LI, HI Industrial Districts and A(PD) Planned Development Districts
GP: General Commercial, Core Area Commercial, Regional Commercial, Neighborhood Community Commercial, Medium Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, Residential Support for the Core, Light Industrial, Public Park and Open Space, and Public Quasi Public.
Document Description
Generally bounded by Coleman Avenue and the extension of Washington Street on the north, 4th Street through 7th Street on the east, I-280 on the south and White Street and Stockton Avenue on the west. Proposal provides a long-range conceptual program for revitalizing the Downtown by allowing high density infill development and replacement of underutilized uses, and expanding the Greater Downtown Core Area and land use intensities to the west and north into areas that are presently undeveloped and underutilized.
Contact Information
Name
Stephen M. Haase
Agency Name
City of San Jose
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Jose
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Coleman Avenue, Stockton Avenue, 4th Street, and Interstate 280
Total Acres
992
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
87 and 280
Railways
UP/SPRR
Airports
NYM San Jose International Airpo
Schools
San Jose Unified
Waterways
Guadalupe River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
San Jose City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.