Road 108 Widening Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003041145
Lead Agency
Tulare County
Document Title
Road 108 Widening Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/2/2010
Document Description
The County of Tulare and the cities of Tulare and Visalia, in cooperation with Caltrans and the Federal Highways Administration, propose to widen a 4.75-mile segment of the Road 108, also known as Hillman Street or Demaree Road, from Leland Avenue in the City of Tulare to Caldwell Avenue in City of Visalia. Road 108 is proposed to be widened from two to six lanes from Leland Avenue to Avenue 248 (Cartmill Avenue), and from two to four lanes from Avenue 248 to Caldwell. Other proposed project features include intersection improvements with traffic signals, left-turn channelization, minor highway realignment, construction of a raised or depressed median, paved shoulders, curb, gutter and sidewalks, widening of waterway crossings, right-of-way acquisition, and utility relocation.
Contact Information
Name
Susan Bransen
Agency Name
Caltrans Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Tulare, Visalia
Counties
Tulare
Cross Streets
Avenue 280, 272, 264, 256, 252, 248, and Leland Avenue
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
99, 63
Railways
SPRR, UPRR
Airports
Visalia
Waterways
Packwood Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Caltrans Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.