Addendum #4 to the Final EIR for the Sedgwick Reserve Infrastructure Plan - Sedgwick Reserve Offices and Accommodations Project-Garage #1 and #2 Reconstruction
8 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2003041096
- Lead Agency
- University of California, Santa Barbara
- Document Title
- Addendum #4 to the Final EIR for the Sedgwick Reserve Infrastructure Plan - Sedgwick Reserve Offices and Accommodations Project-Garage #1 and #2 Reconstruction
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 7/9/2018
- Present Land Use
- Academic/Research
- Document Description
- The Santa Barbara Campus proposes to demolish two structures, Garage #1 (660 sq. ft.) and Garage #2 (748 sq ft.) at the Sedgwick Reserve and rebuild them as office space and accommodations, respectively, for researchers at the Reserve. The Sedgwick Reserve Infrastructure Plan Final EIR included an evaluation of demolishing Garage #1 and retaining Garage #2. The proposed project would demolish both structures and rebuild them in the same size and building footprint. Garage #1 would become the LaKrez Director's and researcher's office and Garage #1 would become researcher accommodations. A new septic system would be installed to serve the researcher's accommodations.
- Contact Information
-
Shari Hammond
University of CA, Santa Barbara
University of Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-1030
Phone : (805) 893-3796
Location
- Counties
- Santa Barbara
- Cross Streets
- Brinkerhoff and Roblar Avenues
- Total Acres
- 6
- Parcel #
- 133-16-056
- State Highways
- 217
- Airports
- Santa Barbara
- Waterways
- Goleta Slough
- Other Location Info
- Nearest City: Los Olivos
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- University of CA, Santa Barbara
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- UC, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-1030
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes