Riverside Corona Feeder (RCF) Project

10 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2003031121
Lead Agency
Western Municipal Water District
Document Title
Riverside Corona Feeder (RCF) Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/16/2012
Present Land Use
Various land uses, primarily road right-of-ways / Various / Various
Document Description
The proposed project includes a large capacity water pipeline, and related facilities associated with aquifer storage and recovery. The pipeline is approximately 28 miles long and ranges up to 78 inches in diameter. Up to a total of 20 new and existing groundwater wells may be installed/ utilized within the Basin Area in San Bernardino County. Existing recharge basins will be used to spread imported water in the San Bernardino Groundwater Basin. The completed project is to be located primarily underground within existing road right-of-way.

Contact Information

Name
Jack Safely
Agency Name
Western Municipal Water District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Colton, Corona, Grand Terrace, Riverside, San Bernardino
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Various
Zip
Various
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
I-15, I-10, SR-60, SR-91
Railways
BNSF, Southern Pacific
Airports
Riverside, Flabob
Waterways
Santa Ana River, Gage Canal
Township
2S
Range
6W
Base
SBB&M
Other Information
Cont. Airports: San Bernardino Int'l

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Western Municipal Water District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print