McDaniel Slough March Enhancement Project Supplement
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003022091
Lead Agency
City of Arcata
Document Title
McDaniel Slough March Enhancement Project Supplement
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/26/2010
Document Description
The original McDaniel Slough Restoration plan restores tidal wetland functions to 200 of 240 acres of former tidal salt/brackish marsh adjacent to Humboldt Bay in N. California & enhances the remaining 40 acres as freshwater & brackish ponds, grasslands/riparian areas & includes enhancement of McDaniel Slough/Janes Creek. The enhancement removes barriers to fish access & includes deepening historic slough channels, partial removal of failing or obsolete levees, & restores the tidal estuary. Since the EIR adoption, CDFG acquired additional lands allowing the project to restore/enhance an additional 22 acres of tidal & 23 acres of freshwater habitat. Proposed changes will result in an 1.19 acres of additional impacts to wetlands to be fully mitigated by creation of new wetlands, restoration of 222 acres of tidal wetlands & enhancements of freshwater wetlands.
Contact Information
Name
Mark S. Andre
Agency Name
City of Arcata
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Arcata
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
V Street and Hwy. 255
Zip
95521
Total Acres
285.5
State Highways
255, 101
Railways
Northeast RR Auth.
Waterways
Janes Creek, Humboldt Bay
Township
6N
Range
1E
Section
31&32
Base
HB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Arcata
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.