Stenner Creek-Foothill Bridge Replacement Project ER-188-02
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003021009
Lead Agency
City of San Luis Obispo
Document Title
Stenner Creek-Foothill Bridge Replacement Project ER-188-02
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/1/2005
Present Land Use
High Density Residential
Document Description
The City of San Luis Obispo proposes to replace the existing Foothill Boulevard bridge crossing over Stenner Creek. The existing bridge, consisting of two 13.0-foot diameter culverts, is approximately 184.0 feet long and 31.0 feet wide. The new bridge would be a free span, open bottom design of approximately 49.0 feet long and 78.0 feet wide. The project would proceed in four general phases: 1) diversion and dewatering of Stenner Creek; 2) demolition of existing bridge structure and preparation of project site; 3) construction of new bridge structure; and 4) site restoration. The proposed bridge replacement would occur in two phases: 1) demolition and construction of the southern (downstream) aspects of the bridge; and, 2) demolition and construction of the northern (upstream) aspects of the bridge.
Contact Information
Name
Michael Codron
Agency Name
City of San Luis Obispo
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Luis Obispo
Counties
San Luis Obispo
Cross Streets
Foothill Boulevard; California Boulevard
Zip
93401
Total Acres
1.26
State Highways
1
Railways
UPRR
Schools
California Polytechnic State Univ.
Waterways
Stenner Creek
Township
30S
Range
12E
Section
23/26
Base
MDBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Communit Development Director
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.