Proposed Negative Declaration for a Student Recreation Center at Humboldt State University

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2002112110
Lead Agency
California State University Board of Trustees
Document Title
Proposed Negative Declaration for a Student Recreation Center at Humboldt State University
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/25/2003
Present Land Use
PF (Public Facility)
Document Description
The Student Recreation Center is Phase I of the program to renovate the Forbes Physical Education Complex and Field House to provide students with enhanced indoor recreational and physical fitness opportunities. Phase I is a student fee funded component that includes the renovation of the 35,000 square foot Field House, the addition to the Field House of approximately 9,800 square feet fitness center, and related site improvements. Approximately 6,000 square feet of enclosed building footprint will be added to accommodate the improvements. The project site is already developed with the Field House, walkways and a small landscaped area.

Contact Information

Name
Robert Schulz
Agency Name
Trustees of the State University
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Arcata
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
17th and Union
Zip
95521
State Highways
101, 299
Schools
Humboldt State University
Waterways
Humboldt Bay, Jolly Giant Creek
Township
6N
Range
1E
Section
28

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Trustees
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print