SMART Initial Operating Segment (IOS) Petaluma to Santa Rosa

42 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2002112033
Lead Agency
Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit Commission
Document Title
SMART Initial Operating Segment (IOS) Petaluma to Santa Rosa
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/29/2011
Present Land Use
Limited Industrial
Document Description
The project is limited to the rehabilitation of four railroad trestles at the Lichau Creek, Copeland Creek, Hinebaugh Creek, and the SCWA Flood Control Channel railroad crossing locations as well as the replacement of three existing wood trestles with concrete box girder bridges at the Upper Petaluma River, Willow Brook and Colgan Creek railroad crossing locations. In addition, the Santa Rosa Creek railroad crossing will be repaired and modified in order to improve its integrity. The CA DFG is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 1600-2011-00086-3 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit Commission.

Contact Information

Name
Adam McKannay
Agency Name
DFG
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Cloverdale, Larkspur, Santa Rosa
Counties
Marin, Sonoma
Cross Streets
Todd Road and South Moorland Ave
Zip
95407
Total Acres
44
Parcel #
134-171-045, 047,055,058,059,-183-008,009
State Highways
US Hwy 101
Railways
SMART Right of Way
Airports
No
Schools
Bellevue ES
Waterways
Todd Channel
Township
6N
Range
8W

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print