SR 99 Auxiliary Lane Project Between SR 32 & E. 1st Ave., Chico, CA
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002112002
Lead Agency
Butte County Association of Governments
(BCAG)
Document Title
SR 99 Auxiliary Lane Project Between SR 32 & E. 1st Ave., Chico, CA
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/17/2010
Document Description
The proposed project would improve the operational characteristics of SR 99 between SR 32 and East 1st Avenue by providing an auxiliary lane in each direction. The project would involve the following components: widening the two Bidwell Park Viaduct bridges; widening SR 99, including the southbound SR 32 off - ramp and northbound SR 32 on - ramp; widening East 1st Avenue; widening East 1st Avenue on - ramp; widening Palmetto Avenue undercrossing; realignment of the existing bike path; constructing 33 new bridge piers, including the footings and columnsl within the ordinary high water mark of Big Chico Creek; and installing rock slope protection (RSP) for each of the 6 new piers within the ordinary high water mark of Big Chico Creek.
Contact Information
Name
Gary L. Hobgood
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Chico
Counties
Butte
Cross Streets
SR 32 & E. 1st Ave.
Zip
95928
Total Acres
~ 35
Parcel #
003-501-025, 045-192-042, and 045-192-061/ partial take of various parcels
State Highways
99
Railways
Southern Pacific Transportation
Schools
California State University, Chico
Waterways
Big Chico Creek
Township
22N
Range
1E
Section
23,25
Base
USGS
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.