Los Angeles Mission College Master Plan

Document Description: Project entails an update to the LA Mission College Master Plan (2018 Update or Project). The Master Plan provides for long-range planning of campus facilities. A Facilities Master Plan was adopted for LA Mission College in 2007. The Facilities Master Plan was subsequently revised in 2009 and again in 2014. Analysis under CEQA was completed for each of these iterations. The 2018 Update completes a new Student Services building with 3-levels and 64,000 sf, representing an increase of 9,000 sf compared to the version of the same building approved in the 2009 Facilities Master Plan. On the basis of the entire record before it, LACCD found that no subsequent or supplemental EIR was required under Public Resources Code, section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines, section 15162. However, because the project would require some minor changes to the previous environmental documentation to make them relevant for the project, an Addendum was prepared pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15164. The Addendum, together with the prior environmental documents, fully and completely accounts for all environmental impacts of the Project, which would either be less than significant or reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of mitigation already required under the prior environmental documents.

Contact Information: Thomas Hall
Los Angeles Community College District
770 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-891-2119

Cities: Los Angeles
Counties: Los Angeles
Cross Streets: Hubbard Street
Zip: 91342
Total Acres: 22.5 + 7 ac
Parcel #: 252-501-2001, 1005; 258-001-5903
State Highways: I-210
Railways: Metrolink
Airports: No
Schools: Harding Street School, Hubbard Street School, Olive Vista JH, Fi
Waterways: No
Other Location Info: Community: Sylmar
Other Information: Schools:First Lutheran School, Morningside School, Dyer St. School, Filmore St. School, Sylmar HS.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No