Streambed Alteration Agreement No. R4-2003-0128 - Siegfried Airstrip Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002082031
Lead Agency
Tuolumne County
Document Title
Streambed Alteration Agreement No. R4-2003-0128 - Siegfried Airstrip Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/27/2008
Present Land Use
AG/AE-37/Dry land grazing and ranch buildings.
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Project applicant, Mr. Rand Siegfried, 21110 Jimmersall Lane, Groveland, California 95321. The applicant proposes to construct approximately 2.56 acres of mitigation wetlands to compensate for impacts to seasonal wetlands and other water resulting from the construction of a private airstrip that crosses two intermittent streams on a 900-acre ranch. Native wetland plant species endemic to the area will be used to revegetate the wetlands. At an existing culvert under the airstrip, gabions will be installed to improve the stream grade for fish passage.
Contact Information
Name
Julie Means
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Tuolumne
Cross Streets
Peoria Flat Road andNew Peoria Flat Road
Total Acres
902+/-
Parcel #
63-060-11,-34, -36 & 63-470-02
State Highways
108
Airports
Private Airstrip
Waterways
Peoria Creek & Stanislaus River
Township
1N
Range
13E
Base
MTDIBALO
Other Location Info
Jamestown
Other Information
Section: 22,23,25, and 26
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.