Patton State Hospital Double Perimeter Fence Project and Temporary Increase in Patients and Staff
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002081046
Lead Agency
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
(CDCR)
Document Title
Patton State Hospital Double Perimeter Fence Project and Temporary Increase in Patients and Staff
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/11/2003
Present Land Use
State Mental Hospital/ Public Facility (PF)/ Public
Document Description
The proposed double perimeter fence security fence project includes the following components:
Demolition of the existing security fencing around each compound, 20 ground guard posts, lighting structures, and one metal storage structure; Construction of new double perimeter security fences; Construction of 13 to 15 new ground guard posts; Installation of improved security lighting, closed circuit television cameras, and a strain sensitive cable sensor system (detects fence disturbances); Grading, retaining wall construction, drainage improvements, and roadway and parking improvements; and Modification to sallyports (which are controlled gates into the secure area).
Contact Information
Name
Jane Hershberger
Agency Name
Department of Corrections
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Highland, San Bernardino
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Highland Avenue and Victoria Avenue
Zip
92369
Total Acres
243 acres
Parcel #
0285-191-10
State Highways
SR-30
Schools
Oehl Elementary School & Serrano Intermediate School
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Corrections and Department of Mental Ha
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.