Hanford Expressway Project - Agreement 2008-0042-R4

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2002061013
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 6
Document Title
Hanford Expressway Project - Agreement 2008-0042-R4
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/11/2008
Present Land Use
Agricultural
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant. Caltrans proposes to widen the existing Cross Creek Bridge (#45-0006 L/R), which is a five-span continuous reinforced concrete slab bridge, by 21 feet to the north. This will require an additional 26 concrete piles (16 inches diameter) driven into the channel and two concrete abutments (2 feet 6 inches by 21 feet long) placed along the embankments. This bridge will be used by the east-bound lanes. To the north of the existing bridge, a new bridge will be constructed to accommodate the west-bound lanes. There will be an open 85 foot median separating the east-bound and the west-bound lanes. The new bridge will be a pile footing foundation and concrete post and deck. The bridge deck (190 feet long by 42.5 feet wide) will be supported by 48 concrete piles (16 inches diameter) and two concrete abutments (2 feet 6 inches wide by 42 feet 6 inches long).

Contact Information

Name
Laura Peterson-Diaz
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Kings
Cross Streets
SR 198 between SR 43 and SR 99
State Highways
43, 99
Railways
SPRR
Airports
Visalia Municipal
Schools
Kit Carson, Delta View
Waterways
Cross Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print