Red Bluff Diversion Dam Fish Passage Improvement Project
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002042075
Lead Agency
Tehama Colusa Canal Authority
Document Title
Red Bluff Diversion Dam Fish Passage Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/5/2011
Document Description
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation seeks to add a new fish screened pumping plant located approximately 1,770 feet upstream of the existing point of diversion for the Tehama-Colusa (TC) and Corning Canals on the Sacramento River above the Red Bluff Diversion Dam (RBDD). The purpose of the new pumping plant is to fulfill conservation goals established by Section 3406(b)(10) of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, which required the Secretary of the Interior to develop and implement measures to minimize fish passage problems for adult and juvenile anadromous fish at the RBDD. The fish screen is approximately 1,100 feet in length and runs along the right side of the Sacramento River where the pumping facility will be located. The pumping plant and associated features will consist of trash racks, flat plate fish screens, a forebay, the pump station, a siphon under Red Bank Creek, and piping to convey water to the TC Canal Sedimentation basin.
Contact Information
Name
Jeff Sutton
Agency Name
SWRCB
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Red Bluff, Tehama
Counties
Colusa, Glenn, Tehama, Yolo
Cross Streets
Road 99W/Altube Avenue
Zip
96080
Total Acres
30
Parcel #
035-047-006/007/009/016
State Highways
99 & 36
Railways
Union Pacific
Airports
Red Bluff Municipal
Schools
Visa/Sac. River Discover Center
Waterways
Sacramento River, Red Bank Creek
Township
27N
Range
3W
Section
33
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
SWRCB Division of Water Rights
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.