2015 EBMUD Water Transfers with GCID, SMWC, and RD 1004
32 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002032132
Lead Agency
Freeport Regional Water Authority
Document Title
2015 EBMUD Water Transfers with GCID, SMWC, and RD 1004
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/1/2015
Present Land Use
Linear project crossing numerous parcels with various land uses, zoning designations, and general plan land use designations.
Document Description
On April 28, 2015, EBMUD approved transfers of Central Valley Project (CVP) water from Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (GCID), Sycamore Mutual Water Company (SMWC), and Reclamation District 1004 (RD 1004). The water would be made available for transfer through cropland idling/crop shifting and be delivered via the Freeport Regional Water Facility (Project). EBMUD recently declared a stage 4 critical drought and the need to use the Freeport Facility to deliver supplemental water to EBMUD's service area. Due to an unexpectedly low CVP allocation, EBMUD is implementing the Project to secure additional water to address water supply shortages.
Contact Information
Name
Michael T. Tognolini
Agency Name
EBMUD
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Alameda, Contra Costa, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Yolo
Cross Streets
Multiple
Zip
Multiple
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
160, 5, 99, 12, 88, 49
Railways
Union Pacific,Southern Pacific
Airports
Sac.International, Sac.Executive
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
Sacramento River, Mokelumne River
Township
7N/5N
Range
4E/10E
Section
11/28
Base
Clarksbu
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
EBMUD
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.