Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor-BART Extension to Milpitas, San Jose, and Santa Clara, CA ;

41 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2002022004
Lead Agency
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Document Title
Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor-BART Extension to Milpitas, San Jose, and Santa Clara, CA ;
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/10/2004
Present Land Use
Commercial, Residential, Industrial
Document Description
The project consists of an approximate 16.3-mile extension of the BART system, which would begin at the planned Warm Springs BART station in Fremont, extend along the Union Pacific Railroad line to Milpitas, and then continue to 28th and Santa Clara Streets in San Jose. From there, BART would leave the railroad right-of-way, tunneling under downtown San Jose to the Diridon Caltrain Station. The BART extension would then turn north under the Caltrain line and terminate at the Santa Clara Caltrain Station.

Contact Information

Name
Tom Fitzwater
Agency Name
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Fremont, Milpitas, San Jose, Santa Clara
Counties
Alameda, Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Multiple
Total Acres
~250
State Highways
237,87,880,680,101
Railways
Union Pacific, Caltrain
Airports
Norman Y. Mineta San Jose I.A,
Waterways
Berryessa, Wrigley, Lower Penitencia, Lower Silver, and Coyote Creeks; Guadalupe River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print